No Products in the Cart
So why do you get the 23mm F1.4 and not the 23mm F2. We're told it is for the extra stop of light ie 100% more in the front door of the lens and for extra resolution. Can't deny the first - if you are going to do dim light photography, this'll deliver that light. You'll also want to stretch your camera to the highest usable ISO for your final purpose - the Fujifilm X-T2 seems to be quite as happy at ISO 6400 as previous cameras were at ISO 1600. I am still nervous at these heights, and in any case with studio lighting and a fixed camera you can go down a long way from there.
The lens is black only, has a plastic petal lenshood, is considerably heavier than the F2, and lacks a weather-sealing skirt. It has a quick AF and picks up an very useful feature - you pull the focusing ring back to disengage the AF and you can manually focus it with extreme precision. This is a design idea it shares with the 14mm Fujinon prime - direct drive instead of wire control. Very much a winner in a studio situation or out at a wedding.
B. So here's the main image, and you'll not see much difference:
B. The firehouse section:
Okay. I really don't see any practical difference in the look of this image compared to yesterday's. Score one for the Fujifilm design team - consistency.
Actually, score two - consistency and good performance. BTW, Heres a comparison of the two boxes so you can see the difference in bulk...
Tomorrow we venture off into the wild woods - we bayonet a zoom lens onto the X-T2 and see just how baaaad zoom lenses are. You may prepare to fear for the worst - not only are they going to be zoom lenses, they are going to be kit zoom lenses.
Don't say we don't live exciting lives at the Little Studio.